|
Mr. S. Ryan:
I wish to share my time with Deputy Owen.
Acting Chairman (Mr. McGinley): Is that agreed? Agreed.
Mr. S. Ryan: Over the years I have been to the forefront in supporting
the objectives of Aer Rianta to develop Dublin Airport to national and
international standards. I also acknowledge the unique contribution
the airport has made and will continue to make to the economy of north
Dublin, the Dublin region and the country. The high growth in air traffic
through the airport and the vehicular congestion on the roads around
the airport and to and from the city centre has raised public awareness
of environmental issues and the justification for developing the airport
to increase passenger numbers from 13 miilion to 40 million per year
with the provision of a second runway.
Notwithstanding the decision by Aer Rianta many years ago to plan for
a second runway, it is imperative that before work begins on the environmental
impact statement we reconsider this decision. I am, therefore, calling
on the Minister to commission an independent study of the projected
aviation requirements of the country and the
desirability of a second international airport in the greater Dublin/midland
region. Can anyone envisage the impact of 40 million passenger movements
per year at Dublin Airport? It will lead to major traffic congestion,
chronic gridlock affecting business and quality of life and the impact
of noise pollution on residential areas, such as Portmarnock, St. Margaret's,
the southern end of Swords and Baldoyle, where it is envisaged that
future developments will take place under the existing flight path of
the airport. There will also be miles of car parking with its implications
for flooding in the area, high demand for office space developments
and a further significant housing demand in the Dublin region at the
expense of other regions.
I recommend a regional approach to meet the civilian aviation needs
of the country in the years ahead. The Labour Party national spatial
plan envisages a new planning approach to Ireland as a whole and not
solely for Dublin. It also encourages job creation outside Dublin. This
was the stated policy of the Government, which is in the process of
devising its own plan.
In reply to a recent question the Minster referred to the Warburg Dillon
Reid report on the review of the strategic options for Aer Rianta. The
consultants looked at the capacity of Dublin Airport to meet future
needs. It did not consider the environmental effects of trebling the
capacity of the airport, nor at alternative locations. As such, the
report is flawed. It stated that transport access to Dublin Airport
in its present form presents a significant constraint on its ability
to meet future passenger growth.
We live in changed times. There is greater awareness of environmental
issues and the quality of life. Those living in the environs of Dublin
Airport and under the flight path are no longer prepared to take directions
from the Minister and Aer Rianta on issues that affect their daily lives.
Rather than engaging in a confrontational approach it would be in the
interests of proper planning and balanced regional development if a
comprehensive study of alternatives was undertaken.
The local groups formed to campaign on this issue are not opposed to
the development of Dublin Airport, far from it. They have always welcomed
planned developments at the airport and they fully support its critical
role in employment and the economic development of north Dublin. They
accept that the existing runway will be used to its full capacity. A
new east-west runway, with all its consequences, is unacceptable to
these communities. It is imperative that the Minister and Aer Rianta
take cognisance of this and respond accordingly.
Mrs. Owen: I thank Deputy Ryan for sharing his time with me.
I am also a great supporter of Dublin Airport. The economic development
it has brought to the region is very important, not only to the approximately
16,000 jobs directly at the airport but those associated with its location.
However, being a supporter of the airport does not mean I am blind to
its needs and to what should or should not happen there.
I call on the Minister of State, as I have on the Minster, to pause,
to tell Aer Rianta not to proceed with the EIS on the basis of the need
for a second large runway, which would be a fourth runway in total.
Time should be taken to undertake a major assessment of the country's
aviation needs. Many questions have not been answered to my satisfaction.
Why has there not been more development of Shannon, Knock and Cork airports?
Why has there not been more development of other regional airports?
Dublin Airport does not have the capacity to be allowed grow its passenger
numbers to 40 million per annum.
The lives of people in Portmarnock are
being seriously hampered and damaged by the airport and the noise and
pollution emanating from it. In their interests and in the interests
of the proper development of the airport I ask the Minister to pause,
undertake an assessment and take into account all the different indices
before proceeding, if at all, with thesecond runway. If the Minister
does not do that he will do a disservice to the airport, the people
working there and the communities in the area.
Mr. Jacob: I compliment Deputies Ryan and Owen for raising this
important issue. The Minister for Public Enterprise outlined the position
in regard to the proposed new parallel runway in reply to Parliamentary
Question No.162 of 15 May. As the House is aware, proposals on the development
of the three State airports, including Dublin Airport, are, in the first
instance, a matter for Aer Rianta, which has statutory responsibility
to manage, operate and develop the airports and to provide such facilities
as it considers necessary for aircraft and passengers.
Dublin Airport is the country's main airport, serving the needs not
just of the travelling public in the capital city and the surrounding
counties, but of the country's tourism, business and freight sectors
generally. Notwithstanding the greatly welcome increase in traffic at
Shannon and cc" Cork airports and to a lesser extend at the regional
airports, Dublin . Airport will remain crucial to the national economy.
Apart from being the country's main access point by air, Dublin Airport
has been, and still is, highly significant in terms of the local economy
of the northside of Dublin. It provides substantial, valuable employment
for the people of the surrounding areas, directly and indirectly, through
the multitude of service industries that have evolved in and around
the facility. This, of course, is also true of the other two State airports
at Shannon and Cork.
Aer Rianta is currently engaged in a review of its long-term master
plan for Dublin Airport. That review is being carried out in consultation
with the stakeholders including airlines, other business customers and
local residents. The plan will determine the key requirements for future
development of infrastructural facilities to ensure that the airport
has sufficient capacity to meet future demand.
Mrs. Owen: The Minister of State should stop there. That is what
we were looking for.
Mr.Jacob: The process of stakeholder consultation is not yet
complete. Regarding the suggestion of the need to identify an alternative
facility to serve the Dublin region, I remind the Deputy that this issue
was addressed in the consultants' report into the future strategy for
Aer Rianta, which the Minister commissioned from Warburg Dillon Read.
The consultants confirmed that Dublin does not need a second airport.
Aer Rianta have appointed an environmental impact consultant to assess
the environmental implications of the proposed new runway. While this
environmental impact assessment is an essential part of the planning
process, it will be an extremely useful and informative study in its
own right, leading to a much greater understanding of the issues involved
and clarifying for all interested parties the impacts and implications
of expanding runway capacity at Dublin Airport. By the end of this year,
Aer Rianta will install and commission noise and flight track monitoring
equipment which will provide precise measurements of the noise generated
by all arriving and departing aircraft at Dublin Airport as well as
monitoring and recording the track or flight path flown by those aircraft.
This equipment will facilitate the most effective management of runway
operations at Dublin and assist in ensuring that local communities experience
the least possible disturbance from aircraft noise. Aer Rianta will
make the data from this monitoring
system available to the local communities and to the planning authority.
Finally, it should be remembered that
the proposal to proceed with the - runway project will in the first
instance be subject to planning permission being obtained. The planning
process will provide the appropriate forum for all interested parties,
including local residents, to have their views and any concerns heard
and taken into account by the planning authorities.
Mrs. Owen: Unfortunately the Minister of State has missed the
point. It will be too late then.
|