Home

Back to archives

UPROAR Over Airport Plans
By Lisa Mitehell
North County Leader 19 Jun 2007

UPROAR, United Portmarnock Residents Opposed To Another Runway are exerting increasing pressure on local and national authorities in an effort to halt proceedings of the planned extension to Dublin Airport. Speaking to the County Leader Matthew Harley, of UPROAR, explained that the expansion plan aims to bring passenger numbers to 35 million per annum by 2020 and to a full capacity of 60 million by about 2035.

"The Green Party in government must stick to their position on this" said Matthew, "an intensive analysis is required for these developments and the Green's must push this issue". The group highlights that when the airport reaches capacity, around 2035, the extra 40 million passengers per year will be doing €680 million worth of global warming damage per year. Using these figures UPROAR have determined that the cost of the damage done by this expansion in climate change damage
alone, comes to a staggering €8.4 billion. This is additional to the €4.5 billion net economic cost UPROAR has estimated for the waste due to a misuse of very valuable land, the economic cost of road congestion and an estimate of the loss of welfare to communities surrounding Dublin Airport.

UPROAR have thus sent a letter to the Chair of the Board of Governors at the European Investment Bank, Brian Cowen, outlining their concerns regarding the EIB's possible support for this development. The EIB is currently considering a possible €200 million loan to the Dublin Airport Authority for an extension to its Terminal 1 and other works. The group however are urging the EIB to withhold approval on the grounds that the development has not been subjected to proper assessment of its full costs and benefits as required by our Department of Finance.

Speaking to this newspaper however Cllr Ciaran Byrne, said "I have always had an open mind on this issue. But the data being presented to halt this progress is not convincing. The available information regarding the economical, environmental, infrastructural and social elements of the development leads me to support the airport's expansion. Certainly we need to address the issue of climate damage but there are more effective ways of doing this than hitting aviation. It would be a
competitive disadvantage to this country if we were to cripple aviation through not developing our main airport, the reasons are both social and practical."